Every pro-AI image generation using the work of artists who didn't consent to having their work used like this argument I've seen either misunderstands how AI image generation works, or how artists learn and create, or places no value on the human life behind creative work, or assumes a utopian version of reality rather than the current, existing one where artists do need to actually sell their work to both live and continue to make it. All of it just makes me sad. It's a bleak way to view art.
Things we didn't do:
- Start the fire
- Shoot the deputy
- Steal the cookies from the cookie jar
Things we did:
- Tried to fight it
- Shot the sheriff
- Put the sham in the shama-lama-ding-dong
Things we will do:
- Survive
- Rock you
- Walk 500 miles
- Walk 500 more
Things we won't do:
- Get fooled again
- Back down
- That
Things we will never do:
- Give you up
- Let you down
- Run around
- Desert you
(Oops:
- I did it again)
Spoke with an engineer over the holidays who maintained that Meta is blameless for abuses on their platform. He asked me, mockingly, "should they stop scaling just because they can't moderate everything?"
The answer is YES. Scale is not just a technical issue. If you cannot control your system, stop growing it.
(btw this is also a good example of how #UX comes from more than just the buttons on the screen)
大阪サイバーパンク。”Osaka cyberpunk“ A cold rainy night in Osaka. #cyberpunk #photomonday #Fotomontag #photography
Programmer. Reads books. Plays guitar. Belfast-born, living in Leeds. he/him.